MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520489877 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.151395

Beta2-glycoprotein I Expression in Lupus Nephritis Patients with Antiphospholipid-associated Nephropathy

2016· article· en· W2520489877 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruitong Gao, Wenqing Yu, Yubing Wen, Hang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLupus nephritisAntiphospholipid syndromeNephropathyImmunologyGlycoproteinNephritisSystemic lupus erythematosusInternal medicineDiseaseEndocrinologyAntibodyDiabetes mellitusGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Antiphospholipid-associated nephropathy (aPLN) is a severe condition in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). aPLN should be distinguished from other reasons for renal ischemia. The most important cofactor of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI), was shown in vitro to bind endothelial cells and to induce a procoagulant phenotype. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether β2GPI expression was involved in patients with LN with aPLN and to determine its specificity. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated β2GPI expression in 231 renal biopsy specimens of patients with LN. Data from biopsy reports and clinical information were collected. Immunohistochemical staining for β2GPI expression was performed. RESULTS: Histological aPLN was detected in 88 patients with LN (38.1%). The LN with aPLN consisted of 43 patients (18.6%). Expression of β2GPI was detected in endothelial cells in 14 (32.6%) in renal arteries or arterioles, 11 (25.6%) in glomerular or peritubular capillaries, and a total of 15 (34.9%) of the 43 patients with LN with aPLN. It was mainly expressed in the endothelial cells in patients with LN with aPLN (p < 0.05). The specificity of β2GPI expression in patients with LN with aPLN was 97.5%. CONCLUSION: Expression of β2GPI may be involved in the formation of aPLN in patients with LN. This expression in endothelial cells in kidney tissue may be considered a useful marker for aPLN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207