MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520854581 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.180463

Enhancing Expression of Functional Human Sodium Iodide Symporter and Somatostatin Receptor in Recombinant Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus for In Vivo Imaging of Tumors

2016· article· en· W2520854581 on OpenAlexaff
Jiahu Wang, Rozanne Arulanandam, Richard Wassenaar, Theresa Falls, Julia Petryk, J. Paget, Kenneth Garson, Catia Cemeus, Barbara C. Vanderhyden, R. Glenn Wells, John C. Bell, Fabrice Le Bœuf

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodium-iodide symporterOncolytic virusVacciniaIn vivoCancer researchSomatostatin receptor 2VirotherapyVirusVirologySymporterSomatostatin receptorBiologyMedicineRecombinant DNASomatostatinInternal medicineGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oncolytic virus (OV) therapy has emerged as a novel tool in our therapeutic arsenals for fighting cancer. As a live biologic agent, OV has the ability to target and selectively amplify at the tumor sites. We have reported that a vaccinia-based OV (Pexa-Vec) has shown good efficacy in preclinical models and in clinical trials. To give an additional tool to clinicians to allow both treatment of the tumor and improved visualization of tumor margins, we developed new viral-based platforms with 2 specific gene reporters. Methods: We incorporated the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) and the human somatostatin receptor 2 (hSSR2) in the vaccinia-based OV and tested viral constructs for their abilities to track and treat tumor development in vivo. Results: Early and high-level expression of hNIS is detrimental to the recombinant virus, leading to the aggregation of hNIS protein and early cell death. Putting hNIS under a late synthetic promoter allowed a higher functional expression of the protein and much stronger 123 I or 99 Tc uptake. In vivo, the hNIS-containing virus infected and amplified in the tumor site, showing a better efficacy than the parental virus. The hNIS expression at the tumor site allowed for the imaging of viral infection and tumor regression. Similarly, hSSR2-containing OV vaccinia infected and lysed cancer cells. Conclusion: When tumor-bearing mice were given hNISand hSSR2-containing OV, 99 Tc and 111 In signals coalesced at the tumor, highlighting the power of using these viruses for tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207