IT Capabilities and Strategic Improvisation: A Multi-Method Investigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Start-up organizations are disrupting previously stable industries with new business models. Existing organizations in these environments need to strategically improvise, that is develop the ability to rapidly seize opportunities, and without prior planning, creatively reconfigure their operational capabilities. As a dynamic capability, strategic improvisation (SI) requires three factors: real-time information, instantaneous communication and memory. We proposed that a well-developed information management capability (IMC), IT infrastructure flexibility (ITIF), and organizational memory (OM) facilitate SI. We analyzed results from a telephone survey of IT executives using two methods, variancebased PLS and set-theoretic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). These methods provide a more complete understanding of the complex relationships among SI and IT capabilities such as IMC and ITIF. PLS findings confirm their enabling roles. QCA findings further indicate that these IT capabilities and OM play different, complementary roles in SI. Implications for research and practice are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it