MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521197066

First record and morphometry of the non-indigenous fathead minnow Pimephales promelas (Rafinesque, 1820) (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) in Flanders (Belgium)

2005· article· en· W2521197066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dieter Anseeuw, Thierry Gaethofs, Gerald Louette

Bibliographic record

VenueBelgian journal of zoology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPimephales promelasMinnowCyprinidaeBiologyElectrofishingTeleosteiFisheryMeristicsEcologyZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pimephales promelas is widely distributed across North America. Its home area ranges from southern Chihuahua, Mexico, north to the Maritime Provinces and Great Slave Lake District of Mackenzie (Canada) and from the Rocky Mountains eastwards to the Appalachians. It has been introduced to both Atlantic and Pacific coastal drainage basins in the United States (1, 2). In Europe, reproducing populations of this non-native species have only been documented from the River Chiers in the Meuse basin in France (3). The fathead minnow (P. promelas) is a robust, somewhat laterally compressed, cylindrical cyprinid with a maximal length of 100 mm. Its overall coloration is dark olive-green or brown above with a straw-coloured to whitish belly. At the base of the caudal fin, often a narrow dark vertical bar is present. A diagnostic feature is the shortened first ray in the dorsal fin. Males generally grow larger than females and have a typical swollen black head (4, 5, 6). In 1995, the Institute for Forestry and Game Management (IBW) has made the first wild record of Pimephales promelas for Flanders (Belgium). Fish were collected using a pulsed-DC DEKA 7000 electrofishing unit with a ring anode. Three individuals were recorded in two small tributaries of the River Demer (Scheldt basin). Two specimens were captured in the Munsterbeek and a single specimen in the Zutendaalbeek. In 2001, ichthyological exploration of the Demer subbasin revealed 36 specimens of P. promelas from 7 localities in 3 different waters : Grote Gete, Melsterbeek and Cicindria (Fig. 1). The presence of P. promelas has never been recorded in other basins of Flanders, despite the numerous fish stock inventories by various research groups within the last 10 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelgian journal of zoologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207