The performance of dayneutral strawberries differs between environments in Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The strawberry production season can be extended in Ontario if plantings are protected from adverse weather conditions. At present, dayneutral cultivars developed in California are used for production, but are not well adapted to Ontario conditions. The objectives of this study were to determine suitable dayneutral cultivars for production throughout Ontario and to investigate how they react to high tunnel environments. Two sets of trials were run. The first set, planted in 2005 and harvested in 2005–2006, compared six dayneutral cultivars of strawberries in four environments. The second set, planted in 2010 and harvested in 2010–2011, compared five dayneutral cultivars grown in four environments. For the summer crops, high tunnels had higher yields in the cooler environment at New Liskeard and low yields in the warmer environment of Cedar Springs, when compared with outside plantings. In the spring, this trend was reversed. ‘Seascape’ and ‘Tribute’ performed consistently in all environments. ‘Albion’ and ‘Monterey’, although medium yielding with lower winter survival, had large fruit size and exceptional fruit quality. ‘Portola’, had large fruits and performed well, so could be of interest to farmers in Ontario. All the European cultivars tested had medium to small berries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".