“The Road to Understanding of Neutrinos – the Hidden Truth About Neutrinos and Other “quanticles““
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This actual submitted publication refers about recent facts and phenomenas, elusive or real particles called neutrinos. During last few months was revealed in giant neutrino's projects in Europe–CERN–LHC (Large Hadron Collider) ATLAS DETECTOR and in MINOS EXPERIMENT / MAIN INJECTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION SEARCH) Fermilab NUMI / Illinois near Chicago, U.S.A. many new realities about these elementary nuclear particles, which consists of whole cosmic matter. Were studied and observed properties of neutrinos, like emission, oscillation (Nobel Prize for Physics 2015), detection and the most interesting (qm) superposition in Project MINOS (735 km of distance between place with Detector 1 in Fermilab and place with Detector 2 in Soudan), under leading of David Kaiser from M.I.T. / Massachussett's Institute of Technology) in Cambridge, U.S.A. D. Kaiser easily said: “The particles neutrinos can existed in many quantum states at the same time.“ According this theory, particles neutrinos can rotate according direction of clocks hands and against their direction at the same time, or could be together nonexcited and excitated. About (QM) SUPERPOSITION before 100 years was reflected already Erwin Schrodinger in mind–experiment the Schrodinger's cat. In July's number of Journal Physical Review Letters, Physicist David Kaiser and his team studied distribution of all types of neutrinos produced in Chicago's Fermilab and compared it with distribution of all types on neutrinos detected in Soudan. Finally they had come to believe that, observed particles distributions are the best explanated, that neutrinos are during the flight between Chicago's Fermilab and Mine Soudan, in MINNESOTA, in state known like quantum-mechanic superposition, and not take resemblence of one's concretely type of neutrino. From upper sets realities are offered questions like “are neutrinos immortal or like hologram“. Further parts of this article is dedicated to summarizing of data from Superkamiokande and Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (Nobel Prize for Physics 2015), and emission and detection of neutrinos and other “quanticles“ defined by principles of Prof. Joseph Weber and other scientists. In the ending part of this article is dedicated a chapter to theory of Fermi's Golden Rule (respectively neutrino–antineutrino cross section).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".