MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521567596

“The Road to Understanding of Neutrinos – the Hidden Truth About Neutrinos and Other “quanticles““

2016· preprint· en· W2521567596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Imrich Krištof

Bibliographic record

VenueviXra · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMINOSNeutrinoPhysicsFermilabParticle physicsNeutrino oscillationNeutrino detectorLarge Hadron ColliderNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This actual submitted publication refers about recent facts and phenomenas, elusive or real particles called neutrinos. During last few months was revealed in giant neutrino's projects in Europe–CERN–LHC (Large Hadron Collider) ATLAS DETECTOR and in MINOS EXPERIMENT / MAIN INJECTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION SEARCH) Fermilab NUMI / Illinois near Chicago, U.S.A. many new realities about these elementary nuclear particles, which consists of whole cosmic matter. Were studied and observed properties of neutrinos, like emission, oscillation (Nobel Prize for Physics 2015), detection and the most interesting (qm) superposition in Project MINOS (735 km of distance between place with Detector 1 in Fermilab and place with Detector 2 in Soudan), under leading of David Kaiser from M.I.T. / Massachussett's Institute of Technology) in Cambridge, U.S.A. D. Kaiser easily said: “The particles neutrinos can existed in many quantum states at the same time.“ According this theory, particles neutrinos can rotate according direction of clocks hands and against their direction at the same time, or could be together nonexcited and excitated. About (QM) SUPERPOSITION before 100 years was reflected already Erwin Schrodinger in mind–experiment the Schrodinger's cat. In July's number of Journal Physical Review Letters, Physicist David Kaiser and his team studied distribution of all types of neutrinos produced in Chicago's Fermilab and compared it with distribution of all types on neutrinos detected in Soudan. Finally they had come to believe that, observed particles distributions are the best explanated, that neutrinos are during the flight between Chicago's Fermilab and Mine Soudan, in MINNESOTA, in state known like quantum-mechanic superposition, and not take resemblence of one's concretely type of neutrino. From upper sets realities are offered questions like “are neutrinos immortal or like hologram“. Further parts of this article is dedicated to summarizing of data from Superkamiokande and Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (Nobel Prize for Physics 2015), and emission and detection of neutrinos and other “quanticles“ defined by principles of Prof. Joseph Weber and other scientists. In the ending part of this article is dedicated a chapter to theory of Fermi's Golden Rule (respectively neutrino–antineutrino cross section).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.015
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueviXraSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207