Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, the so-called relative <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -capacity is introduced and investigated in a close connection to the viscosity solution of the <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -Laplace equation. We not only show that the relative <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -capacity equals the limit of the p -th root of the relative p -capacity as <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>p</m:mi> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {p\to\infty} and hence has a simple geometric characterization in terms of the Euclidean distance, but also establish several basic properties for the relative <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -capacity. Consequently, we apply the relative <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -capacity to the embedding theory of the <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -Sobolev space. More geometrically, we affinize the relative <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> {\infty} -capacity and its fundamental features as much as possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it