[An early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics is equally effective as the standard intravenous therapy in severe community acquired pneumonia].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare an early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics with the standard intravenous therapy in patients admitted to hospital with severe community acquired pneumonia. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised prospective trial with follow-up at 28 days. METHOD: Patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospital were randomised for 7 days intravenous antibiotic therapy (control group) or for an early switch to oral antibiotic therapy after 3 days of intravenous antibiotic therapy (intervention group). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure. The length of hospital stay was a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: Out of the 302 patients included in the trial, data was analysed from 265 patients. The mortality rate in the intervention group did not differ significantly from that of the control group (mean difference: 2%; 95% CI: -3-8). After 28 days, 83% of the patients in the intervention group and 85% in the control group were clinically cured (mean difference: 2%; 95% CI: -7-10). The length of hospital stay was 1.9 days shorter in the intervention group (95% CI: 0.6-3.2 days). CONCLUSION: An early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics in patients admitted to hospital for severe community acquired pneumonia is safe and reduces the length of hospital stay by approximately 2 days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".