Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spectroscopic observations of Cyg (K0 III) taken over 12 seasons from 1999 to 2010 with a resolving power ∼100,000 are analyzed for radial velocities, granulation properties, and projected rotation rate. The new radial velocities, which are on an absolute velocity scale with convective blueshifts removed, contribute to the determination of the 55-year orbit parameters, but are insufficient to be definitive. Line-depth ratios show photospheric temperature variations amounting to ∼4 K, likely arising from a magnetic cycle. A small velocity variation, ∼100 m s −1 , may mimic the temperature variations. Fourier analysis of the line broadening yields the projected rotation rate v sin i = 1.0 ± 0.2 and macroturbulence dispersion = 4.45 ± 0.05 km s −1 . A possible rotation modulation in velocity with a period of ∼1.5 years is noted. The third signature of granulation, i.e., greater blueshifts for weaker lines, is measured and indicates a photospheric velocity gradient in Cyg that is 1.1 ± 0.1 times the Sun's, which is consistent with previously measured K giants. Mapping the line bisector of the Fe i λ 6253 line on to the third-signature plot results in a flux deficit with a maximum 4.9 km s −1 redward of the line core and an amplitude of 16.5% ± 0.5% of the core depth, values typical of K giants. A 145 K disk-averaged temperature difference between granules and lanes is implied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".