MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522319574

Diatoms and databases: a short review

2001· review· en· W2522319574 on OpenAlexaff
Maria-Clara Poulin, Michel Coste, François Straub, Luc Éctor

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is becoming increasing obvious that the transmission of information is crucial in the global scientific context. One only has to link of the consultation of type specimens from a diatom herbarium or the verification of an identification through electronic consultation of a photographic library. Computerized databases on diatoms could become indispensable tools supporting taxonomic uniformity. We are highlighting some advance in the field of electronic archiving diatom information and this should be regarded only as a short review. Examples are taken from various countries who have created electronic databases on diatoms. At the beginning of this new millennium, we will assist in a proliferation of websites devoted to diatom research. If we work together, we can develop the basis for a new era of research in diatomology, accord greater importance to computerizing the databases and ensuring their transmissibility to our colleagues all over the world. / Il devient de plus en plus évident que la transmission d'information est primordiale dans le contexte scientifique global. Il suffit de penser tout simplement à la consultation des spécimens types d'herbier de diatomées ou encore à la vérification d'une identification par la consultation d'une photothèque par voie électronique. Des bases informatisées sur les diatomées peuvent devenir des outils indispensables permettant de supporter une uniformité taxonomique. Cet article se veut une brève revue des bases de données existantes sur les diatomées et, pour cette raison, nous avons surtout mis en évidence les récents avancements technologiques dans le domaine de l'archivage électronique des données sur les diatomées. Des exemples ont été puisés dans divers pays qui ont créé de telles bases de données électroniques sur les diatomées. A l'aube de ce nouveau millénaire, nous allons assister à une prolifération de sites électroniques voués aux diatomées. En travaillant ensemble, il nous sera possible d'élaborer les fondements d'une nouvelle ère de recherche en diatomologie, d'accorder une part plus importante à l'informatisation des bases de données et d'en assurer la transmissibilité auprès de nos collègues du monde entier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207