Adaptación transcultural para la población española del cuestionario western ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) para inestabilidad de hombro
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La EVALUACION DE LA CALIDAD DE VIDA en un paciente representa el impacto que una enfermedad y su consecuente tratamiento tienen sobre la percepcion del paciente de su bienestar. Dicha evaluacion nos ofrece ademas una informacion mas completa de los efectos de la enfermedad y una medida mas global del resultado de una intervencion medica. Los cuestionarios de CALIDAD DE VIDA RELACIONADA CON LA SALUD (CVRS), en sus diferentes ambitos, surgen de la necesidad de evaluar por parte de los profesionales de la salud, los resultados obtenidos en la aplicacion de los tratamientos medicos, ademas de poder monitorizar de forma mas optima el grado de mejoria por parte de los pacientes. Evaluar la Inestabilidad del hombro representa una dificultad mayor, ya que los sintomas pueden ser intermitentes o estar relacionados con actividades especificas que anticipen la aparicion de los mismos y es por ello que aquellos metodos que enfocan la medicion en el rango de movilidad, el dolor, limitacion funcional o la fuerza, sin tener en cuenta la aprension, pueden presentar valores anormalmente elevados en la escala de medicion en pacientes con una franca inestabilidad. Existen cuestionarios, como el WESTERN ONTARIO SHOULDER INSTABILITY INDEX, (en adelante WOSI) que fueron creados con el objetivo de suplir ese deficit de informacion y para que sea el paciente quien pueda expresar los diferentes sintomas y sensaciones, respecto a las deficiencias y limitaciones que su hombro presenta en las distintas actividades de la vida diaria. Entre los diferentes CVRS especificos para la patologia de hombro actualmente tambien denominados PROM (Patient Reported Outcome Mesure) y concretamente los que se basan en el estudio y seguimiento clinico de la Inestabilidad de hombro, el cuestionario WOSI ha demostrado a traves de diferentes estudios que es sensible en la deteccion de los sintomas y sensaciones que refieren los pacientes afectos de inestabilidad gleno-humeral. Ello unido a que dicho cuestionario obtiene unas puntuaciones y porcentajes de los mas altos en las valoraciones psicometricas, asi como por su versatilidad en su administracion, lo hacen uno de los mas indicados para el diagnostico y seguimiento de los pacientes afectos de dicha alteracion. Dicho cuestionario se halla dividido en cuatro dominios: Examen fisico (10 items), Actividades Deportivas, recreativas y trabajo (4 items), Estilo de vida (4 items) y Esfera emocional (3 items). Cada item se responde mediante una escala VAS de 100 m.m. obteniendose con la suma de ellos la puntuacion del cuestionario, que puede oscilar entre 0 puntos y 2100, siendo 0 la mejor puntacion posible y 2100 la peor. Dicha puntuacion mediante una ecuacion puede transformarse en porcentajes entre 0 y 100 %. Ademas, el cuestionario tiene un cuadernillo de aclaraciones en las que se especifica el sentido exacto que se le quiere dar a cada item para poder resolver las dudas de los pacientes. El trabajo que se presenta es la adaptacion transcultural al idioma Espanol y la validacion psicometrica de dicho cuestionario, de su version original. EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF LIFE in a patient represents the impact of a disease and its subsequent treatment have on the patient's perception of their welfare. Such assessment also gives us a more complete information on the effects of the disease and a more comprehensive measure of the result of a medical intervention. The questionnaires of QUALITY OF LIFE RELATED TO HEALTH (HRQOL) in different areas, arising from the need to evaluate by health professionals, the results obtained in the application of medical treatments, in addition to monitoring of optimal shape the degree of improvement by patients. Evaluate shoulder instability represents more difficult, because the symptoms can be intermittent or be related to specific activities that anticipate the emergence of the same and that is why those methods that focus on measuring the range of motion, pain, functional limitation or force, regardless of apprehension, may have abnormally high values on the scale of measurement in patients with instability. Questionnaires, such as the Western Ontario SHOULDER INSTABILITY INDEX (hereinafter WOSI) were created in order to supply this information gap and to be the patient who can express different symptoms and feelings, on deficiencies and limitations his shoulder presented in the various activities of daily living. Among the various specific HRQOL for shoulder pathology now also called PROM (Patient Reported Outcome Mesure) and specifically those based on the study and clinical monitoring of Shoulder Instability, the WOSI questionnaire has been shown through various studies it is sensitive in detecting symptoms and sensations that refer the patients with glenohumeral instability. This coupled to the questionnaire scores and percentages obtained some of the highest in the psychometric assessments, as well as its versatility in his administration, make it one of the most suitable for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with this alteration. The questionnaire is divided into four domains: physical exam (10 items), sports activities, recreational and work (4 items), Lifestyle (4 items) and emotional Sphere (3 items). Each item is answered by a VAS scale of 100 M.M. obtaining the sum of them with the questionnaire score, which can range between 0 and 2100 points, with 0 being the best and the worst rating 2100. This score by an equation can be transformed into percentage between 0 and 100%. In addition, the questionnaire has a booklet clarification on the exact meaning that he wants to give each item to resolve the doubts of patients specified. The work presented is the Spanish language cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the questionnaire, from its original version.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it