MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522364373 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/81.s1.234

SRC Expression and Activity Regulate Mouse Blastocyst Formation.

2009· article· en· W2522364373 on OpenAlexaffabout
Holly Giannatselis, Andrew J. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystOuabainBiologyProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcEmbryoCell biologyAndrologyEmbryogenesisInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhosphorylationChemistrySodiumMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The investigation of the mechanisms controlling preimplantation development is necessary to improve our assessment of embryonic development and to apply assisted reproductive technologies efficiently. The Na+/K+-ATPase plays a pivotal role during preimplantation development; the period between oocyte-sperm union and uterine wall invasion. Activity of the Na+/K+-ATPase establishes a trans-epithelial ionic gradient that facilitates the movement of water to form the fluid-filled blastocyst cavity. Reaching the blastocyst stage is necessary for implantation, and consequently, successful pregnancy. The Na+/K+-ATPase is implicated in regulating tight junction assembly and function and most recently in extracellular protein interactions. Signal transduction properties of the Na+/K+-ATPase have been discovered following binding of cardiotonic steroids (CTS), such as ouabain, to its α subunit leading to SRC activation. We hypothesize that pump activation induced by ouabain leads to SRC activation, resulting in the regulation of tight junction formation and function during mouse preimplantation development. To investigate this hypothesis, embryos were collected following application of superovulation methods to MF1 female mice. Preimplantaion embryos of the desired stage were subjected to CTS treatment or Src Family Kinase (SFK) inhibition followed by immmuofluorescence. Morula stage embryos were treated with 10-3 M, 10-5 M, 10-7 M, 10-9 M ouabain or bufalin to characterize affects of CTS treatment on blastocyst formation. Treatment with 10-5 M, 10-7 M, and 10-9 M CTS for 30 h did not significantly affect the proportion of morulae that progressed to the blastocyst stage. However, embryos treated with 10-3 M CTS did not progress to the blastocyst stage. Next experiments investigated the effects of treating blastocysts with 10-3 M, 10-4 M, and 10-5 M ouabain for 2 or 10 min to characterize influences of ouabain treatment on SRC phosphorylation by whole-mount immunofluorescence. Reduced Tyr418 phosphorylation after treatment with 10-3 M ouabain for 10 min was apparent when compared to control embryos. Next experiments treated morulae in PP2 (SFK blocker) for 18 h. Embryos treated with PP2 displayed a reversible blockade of development and did not cavitate using 20 μM, 30 μM, or 50 μM PP2. Morulae treated with SU6656, a more potent and specific SFK inhibitor, for 18hr also displayed an inability to cavitate using 1, 5, 10 μM doses. RT-PCR analysis was used to detect mRNAs encoding all SFKs during preimplantation development. mRNAs encoding SRC and YES were detectable at the blastocyst stage while mRNAs encoding FGR, LCK, LYN, FYN, HCK, and BLK were not present in blastocysts. These studies contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms controlling preimplantation development. Activation of SRC through phosphorylation of tyrosine 418 is necessary for mouse blastocyst formation. The presence of a ouabain-induced Na+/K+-ATPase signaling transduction pathway via SRC was revealed in the mouse blastocyst. Future experiments will investigate the effect of SFK inhibition on trophectoderm tight junction function. Research supported by operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207