Significance of fruit and vegetable allergens: Possibilities of its reduction through processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fruit and vegetable allergies are prevalent commonly in adults, infants, and children all around the world, but more importantly in Europe and North America. The only solution is complete abstinence from the responsible food, which can be very difficult due to their presence in the form of hidden or undeclared ingredients. Various studies have shown the direct effect of processing on the secondary structure of proteins that can mitigate the allergic properties. The impact of these processing techniques on fruit and vegetable allergies have shown limited success due to the fact that they have multiple allergens that are especially heat stable. Apples, kiwi, peach, and melons are common fruits, whereas celery and carrot are the common vegetables that can result in allergic reactions for some portion of the population upon exposure.Abbreviations: IgE: immunoglobulin E, OAS: oral allergy syndrome, nsLTP: nonspecific lipid transfer proteins, LTP: lipid transfer proteins, HPP: high-pressure processing, PEF: pulsed electric field, CD: circular dichroism, pI: isoelectric point, DBPCFCs: double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".