MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522527228 · doi:10.2118/181155-ms

A Calculation Model for Steam Property Variation Along Wellbore Trajectory in SAGD Processes

2016· article· en· W2522527228 on OpenAlexafffund
Ning Ju, Gang Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSteam injectionVapor qualityWellboreSteam drumPetroleum engineeringMechanicsHeat recovery steam generatorFlow (mathematics)Boiler (water heating)Superheated steamEngineeringWaste managementHeat transferThermal power stationHeat flux

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam properties such as steam pressure and steam quality are critical parameters to form integrated steam chamber and control steam consumption cost during SAGD process. However, steam property variation along steam injection well was not well understood yet. In this paper, a model describing steam flow behavior in steam injection wellbore was built and solved; accordingly steam property variation along steam injection wellbore can be calculated. In our model, both vertical and horizontal wellbores were further divided into several segments. Mass, momentum and energy balance equations have been applied to steam flow inside each segment. During the derivation of these equations, a void fraction correlation that is based on flow-pattern-independent drift-flux model was applied to describe steam flow in a non-uniform manner. This model was validated by several sets of published field data and a series of general cases were studied to investigate the steam property variation inside wellbore. The computational results indicated that steam property distribution along vertical and horizontal wellbore portions have similar characteristics: steam pressure and steam quality tend to decrease along with wellbore trajectory in both vertical and horizontal wellbore portions during SAGD process; With the increase of steam injection pressure, steam quality decreases faster; with the increase of steam quality during injection, steam pressure decreases faster; With the increase of steam injection rate, steam pressure decrease faster while steam quality decrease slower. For horizontal wellbore, the increase of reservoir permeability tends to slow down the steam pressure decrease but accelerates steam quality deterioration; the increase of oil viscosity tends to slow down the steam quality deterioration but accelerate steam pressure decrease. The results from this study show the effects of steam properties varying along wellbore trajectory under different steam injection conditions and can be used as a design guidance to optimize the steam injection practice in SAGD process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207