MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522581125 · doi:10.2118/181196-ms

New Material Technologies Reduce PDC Drill Bit Body and Cutter Erosion in Heavy Oil Drilling Environments

2016· article· en· W2522581125 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Wong, Andy Bell, M. Williams, Sid Isnor, J. J. Herman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbrasiveHardfacingDrillingDrillDurabilityDrill bitPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMetallurgyCarbideComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In heavy oil applications, drill bit body and PDC cutter erosion are frequently encountered challenges that can significantly affect the durability and overall drilling performance of the bit. Abrasive formations such as unconsolidated sands, drilling fluids with high solids content, and high hydraulic flow rates are all factors that limit the life of the drill bit, and consequently, there exists an opportunity to improve the economics of heavy oil wells through the development of more abrasion and erosion resistant body materials and PDC cutter substrates. This paper will discuss the various stages of research and development performed on drill bit hardfacing and PDC cutter substrate materials to improve durability and minimize repair costs in Canadian Oil Sands applications. Hardfacing development was accomplished through microstructural analysis, experimentation with various carbide compositions and particle sizes, and the incorporation of superhard abrasives (hardness values in excess of 5800 ksi) dispersed throughout the hard metal matrix. Moreover, the development of erosion resistant PDC cutter substrates was achieved through novel manufacturing processes and material research. Close cooperation with operators and the ability for rapid field testing of new technologies has enabled the collection of valuable feedback and performance comparisons between close offset wells. To date, a significant improvement in wear resistance has been achieved in hundreds of runs in the Canadian Oil Sands. These runs consisted predominantly of 10.625 in. and 8.750 in. diameter horizontal intervals, in which the operators typically observed a positive impact on drilling economics. For instance, reduced gage pad wear has resulted in fewer bits falling under-gage, thereby preventing the subsequent bit from having to ream the under-gage section to the correct diameter. Enhanced hardfacing life has reduced bit body erosion surrounding PDC cutters and other brazed components, thus decreasing the number of lost components due to the erosion of supporting material. Furthermore, PDC cutter substrate improvements have reduced the amount of observed carbide loss behind the diamond table in order to mitigate cutter breakage and preserve their formation shearing efficiency. Additional efforts are currently underway to further develop wear resistant materials tailored to abrasive and erosive drilling environments. These technologies have potential to enhance drilling efficiency and repairability of drill bits in heavy oil applications including, but not limited to, the Canadian Oil Sands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTunneling and Rock MechanicsFrench-language works237,207