Combined Exercise Training Improves Glycemic Control in Adult with Cystic Fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Glucose abnormality and diabetes are the most common comorbidities in cystic fibrosis (CF). Combined (aerobic and resistance) exercise program in type 2 patients with diabetes demonstrated an improvement of glycemic control. The aim of the study was to determine whether a combined exercise program is beneficial to improve plasma glucose at 2 h of the oral glucose tolerance test in CF. METHOD: Eighteen adults with CF with glucose abnormality were recruited (Clinicaltrial.gov: NTC02127957), and 17 were randomly assigned to a control or exercise group for 12 wk. V˙O2max, oral glucose tolerance test, muscular endurance and strength, and quality of life were measured pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: Fourteen participants completed the protocol. Patients in the exercise group improved significantly their 2-h plasma glucose values (-2.34 ± 1.26 mmol·L, P < 0.007, confidence interval = 99.22%) and presented a reduction of 17.2% (P < 0.05) in total glucose excursion. No significant change for other parameters was observed. CONCLUSION: A combined exercise program improves glycemic control in CF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".