MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2522832045 · doi:10.2118/181208-ms

Modeling of Heat Transfer Coupled with Fluid Flow for Temperature Transient Analysis during SAGD Process

2016· article· en· W2522832045 on OpenAlexafffund
Kuizheng Yu, Gang Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeat transferThermal conductionConvective heat transferConvectionThermal diffusivityMechanicsThermodynamicsFluid dynamicsThermal fluidsFilm temperatureNatural convectionForced convectionMaterials scienceNusselt numberPhysicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process is the most successful in-situ recovery method for heavy oil and bitumen. It is commonly suggested that heat conduction is the dominant mechanism of heat transfer near the edge of steam chamber. Heat convection is neglected in classical models. In this study, three novel heat tranfer models have been developed to describe the transient heat transfer coupled with steady flow in different injection situations during SAGD process. Both heat conduction and heat convection were taken into account in the three models. Model #1 represents a continuous fluid injection at constant temperature. Model #2 represents a continuous fluid injection with exponentially decreasing temperature. Model #3 represents a periodic fluid injection, in which high temperature fluid is injected at the beginning and then lower temperature fluid is injected instead after a period of time. In the models, reservoir and fluid properties were integrated into two parameters, i.e., thermal diffusivity of reservoir and fluid system, and thermal convection velocity of injection fluid. The two parameters are constant under steady flow condition. The analytical solutions to the three heat tranfer models were derived and validated. The effects of thermal diffusivity and thermal convection velocity were examined. It is found that heat convection and heat conduction occur simultaneously in SAGD process, fluid flow motivates convective heat transfer and increases the overall rate of heat transfer. It is also found that the temperature curves predicted by the analytical solutions in this study show excellent agreements with those predicted by COMSOL. In the reservoir and fluid system with larger thermal diffusivity, the heating area is larger, and the temperature increasing rate is smaller at the same observation location. When the steam is injected at a higher thermal convection velocity, heat can be transported to further distance, and the temperature increasing rate is larger at the same observation location. The newly proposed heat transfer models and newly developed analytical solutions are simple and efficient to quickly obtain the temperature profiles in heavy oil reservoirs during SAGD process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→