MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2523166251 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/5/828

Honeycomb Compound Na<sub>3</sub>Ni<sub>2</sub>BiO<sub>6</sub> As Positive Electrode Material for Na-Ion Battery

2016· article· en· W2523166251 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lituo Zheng, M. N. Obrovac

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGloveboxDiffractometerElectrodeAnodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyChemistryComposite materialScanning electron microscope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Layered sodium transition metal oxide materials are promising candidates as positive electrode for sodium ion batteries. Partial substitution of the transition metal with other metal could modify the crystal structure and electrochemistry of the materials. Honeycomb oxides such as Na3Ni2SbO6 have been studied and showed high energy density.1,2 In this study, honeycomb compound Na3Ni2BiO6 was synthesized and characterized in Na cells. Experimental Stoichiometric amounts of NiO, NaBiO3 and Na2CO3 powders were mixed by ball milling and pelletized. The pellets were heated at 700 ºC for 8 hours first then 750 ºC for 12 hours under oxygen to obtain Na3Ni2BiO6. Heated samples were transferred to Ar-filled glovebox immediately. Electrodes were made with active material, PVDF binder, carbon black at a ratio of 8:1:1 and dried under vacuum at 120 ℃ overnight. 1M NaPF6 in a solution of EC, DEC, FEC (volume ratio 3:6:1) was used as electrolyte and Na foil was used as counter/reference electrode. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured with a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu anode X-ray tube and a diffracted beam monochromator. Results and discussion Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of synthesized Na3Ni2BiO6. The structure resembles that of Rm α-NaFeO2 (space group 166), except for the honeycomb ordering at low angles not described by the Rm α-NaFeO2 structure (indicated by stars). The honeycomb structure is generated by the 2:1 ordering of edge sharing NiO6 and BiO6 in the a-b plane. An impurity phase of NiO was present (indicated by solid circles). Figure 2 shows the voltage curve of Na3Ni2BiO6 for the first 2 cycles in the voltage range of 1.5 V – 3.8 V and 1.5 V – 4.5 V. Na3Ni2BiO6 was found to have a reversible capacity of ~80 mAh/g, corresponding to the reversible removal of ~0.5 Na per NaNi2/3Bi1/3O2. It should be noted that the heavy atomic weight of Bi lowers the gravimetric capacity. The voltage curve is characterized by two flat plateaus located at ~3.3 V and ~3.5 V during charging, which is typical for Ni-compounds. The two plateaus are both reversible during discharging with a hysteresis of ~0.2 V. When the cell was cycled between 1.5 V – 4.5 V, another plateau with a capacity of ~20 mAh/g appears at ~4.3 V upon charging. However this plateau is not reversible, as can be seen by the similar discharge curve to that of cycled between 1.5 V – 3.8 V. The cycling performance, rate capability and structural changes during charge/discharge will also be discussed. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge funding from NSERC and 3M Canada under the auspices of the Industrial Research Chair and Discovery grant programs. References 1. D. Yuan et al., Adv. Mater., 26, 6301-6306 (2014) 2. J. Ma et al., Chem. Mater., 27, 2387-2399 (2015) Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→