MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523516291 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.175695

Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Modeling of the Cellular Dosimetry of<sup>64</sup>Cu: Comparison with MIRDcell S Values and Implications for Studies of Its Cytotoxic Effects

2016· article· en· W2523516291 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongli Cai, Yongkyu Luke Kwon, Raymond M. Reilly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)RadiochemistryChemistryDosimetryPhysicsAtomic physicsNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<sup>64</sup>Cu emits positrons as well as β<sup>−</sup> particles and Auger and internal conversion electrons useful for radiotherapy. Our objective was to model the cellular dosimetry of <sup>64</sup>Cu under different geometries commonly used to study the cytotoxic effects of <sup>64</sup>Cu. <b>Methods:</b> Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) was used to simulate the transport of all particles emitted by <sup>64</sup>Cu from the cell surface (CS), cytoplasm (Cy), or nucleus (N) of a single cell; monolayer in a well (radius = 0.32–1.74 cm); or a sphere (radius = 50–6,000 μm) of cells to calculate S values. The radius of the cell and N ranged from 5 to 12 μm and 2 to 11 μm, respectively. S values were obtained by MIRDcell for comparison. MCF7/HER2-18 cells were exposed in vitro to <sup>64</sup>Cu-labeled trastuzumab. The subcellular distribution of <sup>64</sup>Cu was measured by cell fractionation. The surviving fraction was determined in a clonogenic assay. <b>Results:</b> The relative differences of MCNP versus MIRDcell self-dose S values (S<sub>self</sub>) for <sup>64</sup>Cu ranged from −0.2% to 3.6% for N to N (S<sub>N←N</sub>), 2.3% to 8.6% for Cy to N (S<sub>N←Cy</sub>), and −12.0% to 7.3% for CS to N (S<sub>N←CS</sub>). The relative differences of MCNP versus MIRDcell cross-dose S values were 25.8%–30.6% for a monolayer and 30%–34% for a sphere, respectively. The ratios of S<sub>N←N</sub> versus S<sub>N←Cy</sub> and S<sub>N←Cy</sub> versus S<sub>N←CS</sub> decreased with increasing ratio of the N of the cell versus radius of the cell and the size of the monolayer or sphere. The surviving fraction of MCF7<b>/</b>HER2-18 cells treated with <sup>64</sup>Cu-labeled trastuzumab (0.016–0.368 MBq/μg, 67 nM) for 18 h versus the absorbed dose followed a linear survival curve with α = 0.51 ± 0.05 Gy<sup>−1</sup> and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.8838. This is significantly different from the linear quadratic survival curve of MCF7<b>/</b>HER2-18 cells exposed to γ-rays. <b>Conclusion:</b> MCNP- and MIRDcell-calculated S values agreed well. <sup>64</sup>Cu in the N increases the dose to the N in isolated single cells but has less effect in a cell monolayer or small cluster of cells simulating a micrometastasis, and little effect in a sphere analogous to a tumor xenograft compared with <sup>64</sup>Cu in the Cy or on the CS. The dose deposited by <sup>64</sup>Cu is less effective for cell killing than γ-rays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207