MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523516291 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.175695

Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Modeling of the Cellular Dosimetry of<sup>64</sup>Cu: Comparison with MIRDcell S Values and Implications for Studies of Its Cytotoxic Effects

2016· article· en· W2523516291 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongli Cai, Yongkyu Luke Kwon, Raymond M. Reilly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)RadiochemistryChemistryDosimetryPhysicsAtomic physicsNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

64Cu emits positrons as well as β− particles and Auger and internal conversion electrons useful for radiotherapy. Our objective was to model the cellular dosimetry of 64Cu under different geometries commonly used to study the cytotoxic effects of 64Cu. Methods: Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) was used to simulate the transport of all particles emitted by 64Cu from the cell surface (CS), cytoplasm (Cy), or nucleus (N) of a single cell; monolayer in a well (radius = 0.32–1.74 cm); or a sphere (radius = 50–6,000 μm) of cells to calculate S values. The radius of the cell and N ranged from 5 to 12 μm and 2 to 11 μm, respectively. S values were obtained by MIRDcell for comparison. MCF7/HER2-18 cells were exposed in vitro to 64Cu-labeled trastuzumab. The subcellular distribution of 64Cu was measured by cell fractionation. The surviving fraction was determined in a clonogenic assay. Results: The relative differences of MCNP versus MIRDcell self-dose S values (Sself) for 64Cu ranged from −0.2% to 3.6% for N to N (SN←N), 2.3% to 8.6% for Cy to N (SN←Cy), and −12.0% to 7.3% for CS to N (SN←CS). The relative differences of MCNP versus MIRDcell cross-dose S values were 25.8%–30.6% for a monolayer and 30%–34% for a sphere, respectively. The ratios of SN←N versus SN←Cy and SN←Cy versus SN←CS decreased with increasing ratio of the N of the cell versus radius of the cell and the size of the monolayer or sphere. The surviving fraction of MCF7/HER2-18 cells treated with 64Cu-labeled trastuzumab (0.016–0.368 MBq/μg, 67 nM) for 18 h versus the absorbed dose followed a linear survival curve with α = 0.51 ± 0.05 Gy−1 and R2 = 0.8838. This is significantly different from the linear quadratic survival curve of MCF7/HER2-18 cells exposed to γ-rays. Conclusion: MCNP- and MIRDcell-calculated S values agreed well. 64Cu in the N increases the dose to the N in isolated single cells but has less effect in a cell monolayer or small cluster of cells simulating a micrometastasis, and little effect in a sphere analogous to a tumor xenograft compared with 64Cu in the Cy or on the CS. The dose deposited by 64Cu is less effective for cell killing than γ-rays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207