MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523893120

Development and optimization of a protocol for automated, low-throughput RNA purification from whole blood using the PAXgene blood RNA system

2007· article· en· W2523893120 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kalle Guenther, Heike Balven-Ross, Ralf Wyrich

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNARNA extractionDNAWhole bloodNucleic acidBiologyMolecular biologyChromatographyChemistryBiochemistryGeneImmunology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A44 Introduction: Gene expression analysis in peripheral blood is an important tool in molecular diagnostics, monitoring diseases at the molecular level, clinical research, and clinical trials of new drugs. Since the introduction of the PAXgene Blood RNA System, researchers have expressed a need for a low-throughput, automated (LTA) solution for RNA preparation from blood collected in PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes, with purification based on the proven silica-membrane spin-column technology in the PAXgene Blood RNA Kit. The aim of this research study was to develop and optimize a protocol for LTA RNA purification using PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes and the (manual) PAXgene Blood RNA Kit on a robotic platform.
 (Note: The combination of the PAXgene Blood RNA Kit on the robotic platform is for research use only and not for use in diagnostic procedures. It has not received clearance or approval for clinical use in the US, Canada or Europe.)
 Methods: Replicate blood samples were collected in PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes, and starting from the resuspended nucleic acid pellet, RNA was purified using either the manual procedure according to the PAXgene Blood RNA Kit handbook (reference protocol) or the new automated purification procedure (test protocol). To enable comparison of the test and reference protocol performance, purified RNA from both protocols was analyzed spectrophotometrically, by capillary gel electrophoresis, in real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RQ-RT-PCR), and in PCR assays to measure RNA yield, purity, integrity, RQ-RT-PCR inhibition, and traces of genomic DNA (gDNA).
 Results: The new automated PAXgene Blood RNA protocol was highly reliable in that there were no failures in sample processing. Furthermore, the quantity and quality of purified RNA was comparable between both protocols: Greater than 95% of samples processed on the instrument yielded RNA of >3micrograms per tube, all samples contained Conclusion: This research study demonstrates that the new automated protocol using proven silica-membrane spin-column technology and existing chemistry with the new robotic platform provides an efficient and reliable alternative LTA solution to the manual protocol. Automated processing reduces user interaction and hands-on time, resulting in a more convenient workflow compared to the manual PAXgene Blood RNA procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207