Prevalence and clinical impact of fibromyalgia in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Clinical features of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) overlap with those of fibromyalgia (FM). This cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of FM in pSS patients and to compare the clinical features of pSS patients with FM to those without FM. METHODS: One hundred pSS patients were consecutively assessed to identify the presence of FM according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 criteria. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from all patients. Additional assessments included EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) and EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI). The severity of depression was measured by Hamilton depression rating scale 17-items (HAM-D scale). RESULTS: The prevalence of FM was 31.0% (31/100) in pSS. Widespread pain index and symptom severity scale were significantly correlated with ESSPRI (r=0.6542 and r=0.7173, both p<0.0001) and HAM-D scale (r=0.6734 and r=0.6471, both p<0.0001) in pSS. In multivariate analysis, ESSPRI and HAM-D scale were independently associated with increase of tender point count and symptom severity scale. ESSPRI was significantly higher in pSS patients with FM compared to those without FM (p<0.0001). The prevalence of FM in pSS patients with moderate-to-severe depression was significantly higher than those with mild depression or without depression (odds ratio= 10.62, p=0.0009). Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 levels in pSS patients with FM were significantly (p=0.0072) decreased compared to those without FM. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that FM was prevalent in pSS. FM was associated with higher ESSPRI and more severe depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".