MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524353190 · doi:10.1113/jp272762

Sequence determinants of subtype‐specific actions of KCNQ channel openers

2016· article· en· W2524353190 on OpenAlexafffund
Alice Wang, Runying Yang, Harley T. Kurata

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPotassium channelChemistryPharmacologyVoltage-gated potassium channelPotassium channel blockerBiophysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: Retigabine is a KCNQ voltage-gated potassium channel opener that was recently approved as an add-on therapeutic for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Retigabine exhibits very little specificity between most KCNQ channel subtypes, and there is interest in generating more potent and specific KCNQ channel openers. The present study describes the marked specificity of ICA069673 for KCNQ2 vs. KCNQ3, and exploits this property to investigate determinants of KCNQ subtype specificity. ICA069673 acts on a binding site in the voltage-sensing domain that is distinct from the putative retigabine site in the channel pore. ICA069673 has two separable effects on KCNQ channel activity. We identify two channel residues required for subtype specificity of KCNQ channel openers and show that these are sufficient to generate ICA069673 sensitivity in KCNQ3. ABSTRACT: Retigabine (RTG) is the first approved anti-epileptic drug that acts via activation of voltage-gated potassium channels, targeting KCNQ channels that underlie the neuronal M-current. RTG exhibits little specificity between KCNQ2-5 as a result of conservation of a Trp residue in the pore domain that binds to the drug. The RTG analogue ICA-069673 ('ICA73') exhibits much stronger effects on KCNQ2 channels, including a large hyperpolarizing shift of the voltage-dependence of activation, an ∼2-fold enhancement of peak current and pronounced subtype specificity for KCNQ2 over KCNQ3. Based on ICA73 sensitivity of chimeric constructs of the transmembrane segments of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3, this drug appears to interact with the KCNQ2 voltage sensor (S1-S4) rather than the pore region targeted by RTG. KCNQ2 point mutants in the voltage sensor were generated based on KCNQ2/KCNQ3 sequence differences, and screened for ICA73 sensitivity. These experiments reveal that KCNQ2 residues F168 and A181 in the S3 segment are essential determinants of ICA73 subtype specificity. Mutations at either position in KCNQ2 abolish the ICA73-mediated gating shift, but preserve RTG sensitivity. Interestingly, A181P mutant channels show little ICA73-mediated gating shift but retain current potentiation by the drug. Mutations (L198F and P211A), which introduce these critical KCNQ2 residues at corresponding positions in KCNQ3, transplant partial ICA73 sensitivity. These findings demonstrate that RTG and ICA73 act via distinct mechanisms, and also reveal specific residues that underlie subtype specificity of KCNQ channel openers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207