Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe, symptomatic, aortic stenosis at low to intermediate surgical risk: a clinical practice guideline
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Clinical practice guideline on aortic valve replacement; recommendations answering a clinical question.
This clinical practice guideline answers a treatment question using systematic reviews rather than studying synthesis methodology.
Clinical practice guideline on aortic valve replacement drawing on systematic reviews to answer a care question.
Abstract
In patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis but at lower risk of perioperative death, how do minimally invasive techniques compare with open surgery? Prompted by a recent trial, an expert panel produced these recommendations based on three linked rapid systematic reviews
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- BMJ
- Topic
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- Population Health Research InstituteInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesHospital for Sick ChildrenWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- MedicineStenosisGuidelinePerioperativeAortic valve replacementAortic valve stenosisClinical PracticeSurgeryCardiology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes