MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524776464 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v6n3p24

Narrative Mode: A comparative Study on Selected Short Stories of Leo Tolstoy and Edgar Allan Poe

2016· article· en· W2524776464 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeNarratologyFocalizationMode (computer interface)Narrative criticismNarrative networkLiteratureReading (process)Narrative inquiryHistoryLinguisticsArtComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narrative mode is the way in which narrators designed to present the intended story in narratives. narrative mode istherefore the very important issue that should be studied for it is through their narrative mode or way of narration ofthe narrator that writers can do an effort in the reading process of readers in literature or work of art, and it is due tothis reason that scholars like Ronald Barthes’ idea of ‘death of the author’ believe the writer has not a power to say‘the reader should do and shouldn’t do like this and that’ after his/her writing is over. Thus, narratives ingeneral andnarrative mode should be taken as a central point in the investigation of narrative strategies; since other aspects ofnarration like voice, focalization, narrative time and etc would be included in the discussion of narrative mode as away of narration. Therefore, this study discusses narration in one organized work of study for narrative mode has atendency to include almost all elements of narration or narratology for narratology is the study of narration andnarrative mode is all about ways/techniques of narration in narrative strategies. All in all, the very intention behindthis research is related to bring one window of consideration on the different types of narrators and narrative modeshowthe narrative is intrusive or extrusive to the story. In other words, if we consider all the criteria tried to be usedby the different scholars in the classification of narrators that different scholars classify differently, we can subsumedinto one paradigm-related with narrators’ extrusiveness or intrusiveness to the narrative story they narrate. Therefore,our narrative mode that we can experience in literary texts would be either ‘telling mode or showing mode’, thedirect or indirect mode or the diegesis or mimesis mode of narrative. Regarding to the literary productsunderdiscussion; some short stories of Tolstoy and Poe; both these two authors are very famous and well recognizedpersonalities in the Easter/Russia and Western/America part of the world respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it