MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525038403 · doi:10.5006/c2016-07152

Self-healing Pipeline Epoxy Coatings

2016· article· en· W2525038403 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanchao Feng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpoxyMaterials scienceSelf-healingPipeline (software)CorrosionComposite materialMetallurgyMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this work, benzotriazole (BTA) inhibitors were deposited on the surface of nano-SiO2 particles, which served as the inhibitor carriers. Polyelectrolytes were then adsorbed on the particle surface by a layer-by-layer method to prepare the nanocontainers to store inhibitors. The inhibitor-loading nanocontainers were characterized by a number of techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum, Fast Fourier Infrared spectrum and thermal gravimetric analysis. The corrosion resistance and the nano-container doped epoxy coatings was evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Results demonstrate that the SiO2 nanoparticles based polyelectrolyte nano-containers are successfully fabricated to store BTA. The nano-containers added in NaCl solution are able to inhibit the corrosion of the steel. The inhibiting performance is improved with immersion time. The inhibiting efficiency is over 66% after 24 h of testing. It is expected that the inhibiting performance further increases with the continuous release of BTA from the nano-containers with time. When the steel coated with the BTA loaded nano-containers is immersed in NaCl solution, the corrosion inhibition is time dependent upon the release of encapsulated inhibitors from the containers. The change of solution pH upon the coating damage and generation of corrosive environment may trigger the opening of the nano-containers for inhibitor releasing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207