MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525114867

Analyzing Strain in the Ovine Anterior Cruciate Ligament

2011· article· en· W2525114867 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maria Fernando, Nigel G. Shrive, Christina Frank, Mohammad Atarod

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligamentOsteoarthritisKnee JointIn vivoLigamentStifle jointMagnetic resonance imagingJoint (building)Cruciate ligamentBiomedical engineeringOrthodonticsMedicineAnatomyBiologySurgeryPathologyRadiologyStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder affecting adults. Relating the mechanics and biology of the knee joint is crucial to understanding the development and progression OA. A key aim of such studies is to determine the structure/function relationship and failure thresholds of the joint tissues, in-vivo. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is of great interest as it is one of the most commonly injured ligaments linked with premature OA. Previous ACL studies have been unable to determine the stresses within the structure, due to absence of reliable methods of measuring the cross-sectional area of the loaded part of the ligament. Purpose : This study aims to evaluate the normal in-vivo stresses within the ACL, by developing a suitable method to measure the loaded area of the ACL. Methods : Ovine stifle joints were used due to morphological and biochemical proximity to human knee joints. Measurements of in-vivo loadings within the ACL were obtained using an instrumented spatial linkage and robotic test system. Two techniques to measure the area of the loaded ACL will be explored: 3D Virtual Reconstruction (3DVR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). 3DVR: The non-loaded part of the ACL was removed. A cloud of points was measured along the surface of the remaining (loaded) part of the ligament and processed to create a 3DVR of the ACL. MRI: Tests (proton density and T2 mapping) will be run on the 9.4T MR to compare structural differences between a loaded and relaxed ligament. Results : 3DVR method produced only a partial surface reconstruction due to the relatively large size of the probe in comparison to the ligament and femorotibial joint space. Differences between loaded and unloaded MRI images will be assessed using a special jig allowing sequential tensioning of the ligament. Conclusions : It was concluded that the partial 3DVR was insufficient to determine the loaded cross- sectional areas along the ligament accurately. The MRI results will be available for examination shortly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207