MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ER Stress‐Induced SREBP‐2 Activation Contributes to Lipid Accumulation in Tubular Nephrotoxicity

2011· article· en· W2525134693 on OpenAlexafffund
Šárka Lhoták, Sudesh K. Sood, Alistair J. Ingram, Richard C. Austin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsUnfolded protein responseTunicamycinEndoplasmic reticulumSterol regulatory element-binding proteinEndocrinologyInternal medicineChemistryCell biologyNephrotoxicityThapsigarginKidneyBiologySterolCholesterolMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disruption of protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) leads to ER stress and activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Tubular damage caused by nephrotoxic drugs is associated with ER stress. Since ER stress is known to induce lipid dysregulation through the activation of sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs), we hypothesized that lipid accumulation observed in proximal tubules affected by nephrotoxic drugs is a consequence of ER stress‐induced SREBP activation. Mice injected with tunicamycin display vacuolization and ER stress in proximal tubules. The vacuoles contain lipids that co‐localize with increased SREBP‐2 expression and markers of ER stress. In kidney biopsies from cyclosporine A (CsA)‐treated patients we show by immunohistochemistry the co‐localization of SREBP‐2 and ER stress markers in the damaged tubules. Treatment of HK2 renal cells with tunicamycin, thapsigargin or CsA caused UPR activation and increased lipid content. SREBP‐2 activation was shown by the enhanced sterol‐regulatory element‐GFP fluorescence, increased mRNA of downstream genes, and the presence of the mature form of SREBP‐2 on Western blot. These outcomes were blocked by AEBSF, an inhibitor of SREBP‐2 processing. We conclude that lipid accumulation in diseased kidney is associated with SREBP‐2 activation by ER stress . Supported by Heart and Stroke Foundation grant NA6024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationFrench-language works237,207