Cooperative spectrum sharing protocol based on transform domain processing with joint secondary selection and power allocation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to reduce interference to the primary system and further improve the spectrum efficiency, the Fractional Fourier Transform is introduced as a tool to solve the spectrum sharing problem and a new spectrum sharing protocol is proposed in this paper where sinusoidal signals and chirp signals are utilized for primary users and cognitive users, respectively. In our spectrum sharing protocol, secondary users take the initiative to access the spectrum or act as a DF relay to assist the primary system adaptively according to the channel conditions of the direct transmission link. Moreover, the joint optimization of power allocation and user selection of distributed secondary users is studied to achieve the maximum achievable data rate for the secondary system while guaranteeing the target data rate of primary user. Simulation results show that compared with previous protocols, the outage probability of both primary and secondary systems can be improved, and with an increase in the number of secondary users, a higher achievable data rate can be obtained for the secondary system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it