MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525492711 · doi:10.1177/026248930702600201

Layered and Cellular Morphologies in Atactic/Syndiotactic Polystyrene Blends

2007· article· en· W2525492711 on OpenAlexaff
Xia Liao, A. Victoria Nawaby, Y. P. Handa

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Polymers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneTacticityMaterials scienceSolubilityPhase (matter)PolymerChemical engineeringMorphology (biology)Polymer blendDiffusionPolymer chemistryComposite materialCopolymerOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsChemistryPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates for the first time that by blending a polymer with its isomer and subsequently conditioning the mixture with CO 2 gas a layered and cellular morphology can be obtained. Previous reports in the literature on generating layered and cellular morphologies use a stacking method forcing layers of polymers together followed by foaming the material. In this study we present single-phase blends of atactic polystyrene (PS) with its isomer syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) and their fluid phase behavior with CO 2 . Equilibrium solubility and diffusion coefficients of the gas in the PS/sPS blends in the ratios 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75 wt% was determined at 0 and 35 °C; and the role of CO 2 solubility on the types of morphologies generated was investigated. With a decrease in temperature and hence an increase in gas solubility as well as changes in blend composition, foams with various morphological characteristics were obtained. In particular the 50/50 wt% PS/sPS blend conditioned with CO 2 at 0 °C and 3.4 MPa resulted in an intriguing morphology with alternating layers containing small and large cells within a given layer respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellular PolymersSame topicPolymer Foaming and CompositesFrench-language works237,207