Conjugated Organic Polymers As Photocathodes for Hydrogen Evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, there is a global effort being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the implementation of renewable energies. An attractive alternative to fossil fuels is hydrogen, as it can be stored, transported and used as on demand as a liquid fuel while producing only water vapour as a by-product. The production of hydrogen can be attained through the photoelectrochemical splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen, representing a sustainable, carbon neutral method of hydrogen generation. Here we have explored the use of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) films as photocathodes for hydrogen evolution. Our research has been mainly focused on the investigation of the origin of photocurrent at the polymer/electrolyte surface. We show that the photocurrents observed at the P3HT/electrolyte interface are dominated by the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), contrary to what was previously reported in the literature as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Although sluggish kinetics prevent H2 evolution at the polymer interface, we have shown that the addition of an inorganic hydrogen evolution catalyst, such as Pt, on top of the polymer active layer allows for measurable amounts of H2 gas to be produced photoelectrochemically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".