Avant-propos. La retraite au 18 e siècle : désir ou chimère ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AVAnt-ProPoS LA retrAite Au 18 e SiCLe : dSir ou CHimre ? Hlas !que sont devenus ces jours, o des mres chrtiennes ne recommandaient leurs filles que l'amour de la retraite et de la pnitence Carraccioli, 1767 1 L'homme est n pour la socit.La raison, la rflexion, l'inclination, le besoin, le plaisir, tout prouve qu'il est dans l'essence de l'homme de vivre avec ses semblables.Il n'est pas bon que l'homme soit seul ; cela n'est mme pas possible. Dom Philippe Gourdin, 1767 2Le ton est donn : en ces annes 1760, nombre de voix se font entendre dans un long dbat au premier rang duquel se trouvent les philosophes, pour proclamer la sociabilit comme premire vertu de l'homme et s'lever contre les retraites religieuses et la recherche de la solitude.Aprs des sicles de perception positive du retrait du monde, les constantes anthropologiques se voient ainsi bouleverses.Celui qui se met l'cart est vu dsormais comme un marginal, un extravagant, un irrationnel ; on sait combien Rousseau souffrit suite sa dcision prise en 1751 de marcher seul dans une route toute nouvelle 3 .Tout tre humain, qu'il soit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".