Portable Frost-protection Misting System: Trial on Tomato and Sweet Orange Crops
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the North American crop-growing season, although daytime temperatures may remain well above freezing point, nighttime temperatures can easily drop below 0 °C for a few hours. The effects of frost are felt in small operations, such as residential gardens, or in specific areas of a larger operation. Various large-scale measures exist for crop frost protection but they are neither portable nor flexible. A fully automated portable frost-protection misting system that makes use of the latent heat of fusion of water was developed and tested on tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) and sweet orange ( Citrus sinensis ) at the Macdonald Campus of McGill University (Saint-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada). The water tank stores up to 20 gal of pressurized water and detachable auxiliary air tanks provide additional line pressure. The device is lightweight, portable and provides flexible, overhead water misting for two 25-ft rows of crops. It activates autonomously using a thermostat, battery pack, and solenoid valve, and the outlet pressure is regulated using a pressure regulator. It is easily installed and dismantled for expedient relocation and the dynamic system of tubing and nozzles can be modified as required. The system was tested in subzero ambient air temperature ranging from −7.1 to 0 °C. During misting, the flesh of the targeted tomato fruit remained, on average, 3.1 and 3.6 °C warmer than ambient temperatures. The use of the system is currently limited by the infrequent formation of ice on the misting nozzles and in the water lines due drastic drops in temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it