The Cultural Tradition of “Falia” in Preserving Forest by Munanese Ethnic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to describe and analyze the meaning of the tradition of "falia" in preserving forests in Muna Island in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia, by employing a qualitative descriptive method. Key sources of informants were figures of culture, society and youth. Data collection techniques included observation, focus group discussion and documentation. Data analysis consisted of reduction, data presentation and conclusion.Results showed that in preserving forests Munanese people uphold the tradition of "falia" which they consider very important in controlling people‘s behavior their moral life, as well as in guiding humans behavior towards their natural environment. It is suggested that humans maintain and preserve forest each other, forest should be sacred and utilized as needed. Humans are prohibited from cutting down or slashing large trees. Haphazardly cutting down large trees may result in supernatural punishment in the form of disease inflicted by spirits inhabiting the tree. It is also forbidden to cut down trees near river. The tradition of "falia" is maintained through traditional institutions, by setting up a studio for discussion sheld in every village adjacent to a forest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".