MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2525993678

Adding Value to Orientation Through the Use of Skills and Simulation-Based Learning.

2016· article· en· W2525993678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Dale-Tam, Kelly A. McBride

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrientation (vector space)Disengagement theoryOnboardingMedicineFidelityContext (archaeology)Value (mathematics)Medical educationNursingPsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Workshop Topic: Clinical Placement/Orientation The use of primarily didactic methods of education can lead to learner disengagement, lack of knowledge retention and dissatisfaction (Culley et al, 2012). Feedback from previous surgery nursing orientations at the Ottawa Hospital has consistently shown that there was a need for a more engaging and hands on orientation. Adult learners are more engaged when learning is relevant and applicable to practice. Educators must recognize the life and practice experience of the adult learner (Billings and Halstead, 2009). Comprehensive orientation should be hands on, engaging, interactive, and evidenced based, incorporating institutional polices and best practices (Lamers et al, 2013). Taking feedback into consideration, the orientation program was improved with support from managers, directors and other key stakeholders. Through the use of low to medium fidelity skills, and high fidelity simulation, the nurse educators were able to revise the orientation from a primarily didactic model to a skills and simulation based program that is more applicable to practice. Taking the fiscal climate into consideration, this program is cost neutral, but has added great value in learning outcomes and indirectly patient safety. In this workshop participants will have the opportunity to develop and discuss the value of utilizing simulation and skills into an orientation program for new staff within the context of their current onboarding processes. Upon completion of this workshop the participant will: • Reflect upon one's current orientation program structure • Consider adding value to orientation by incorporating skills and simulation • Identify key stakeholders within one's own organization related to orientation program development • Develop a framework for orientation utilizing simulation and skills • Gain knowledge related to making changes to the orientation process within one's organization Open Access Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare→French-language works237,207→