MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526158944

La criminalisation de la participation citoyenne par des conceptions consensualistes de la démocratie participative

2015· article· fr· W2526158944 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ricardo Peñafiel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Penology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceParticipatory democracySocial movementSociologyDemocracyPhilosophyPoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mientras la idea de democracia participativa se impone como “ paradigma de la accion publica”, asistimos a la exacerbacion de los rasgos mas autoritarios del gobierno representativo que se constata principalmente en la tendencia contemporanea a la criminalizacion de la accion colectiva y a la banalizacion del estado de excepcion. En vez de invocar una contradiccion entre un discurso “ participativo” y practicas autoritarias, este articulo intenta mostrar como la criminalizacion contemporanea de la protesta social encuentra sus condiciones de posibilidad dentro del mismo “ discurso participacionista” y de las practicas e instituciones sociales y politicas que se remiten a este. Al analizar cuatro formas de legitimacion de la represion masiva y sistematica de acciones colectivas en las Americas (Quebec, Chile, Ecuador, Venezuela), el texto muestra como el ejercicio de derechos fundamentales (como los de asociacion, de expresion y de manifestacion) se ve (des) considerado como una amenaza para la “ democracia” en funcion de “ consensos” supuestamente alcanzados dentro de foros “ deliberativos” (consultativos) organizados por el poder y dentro de los cuales este conserva sus prerrogativas de la “ calificacion” de los participantes y, sobre todo, de la “ decision”. Esto conduce a una lucha por el sentido entre dos concepciones y practicas de la democracia y de la participacion : la primera “ consensual” y encausada y la otra “ salvaje” o insurgente. Para dar cuenta de esta concepcion salvaje (no domesticada) de la democracia y de la participacion, el texto se basa sobre “ relatos de vida” de participantes anonimos de acciones contestatarias transgresivas ocurridas en las Americas durante et ultimo cuarto de siglo. Este analisis de dos concepciones y practicas de la participacion ciudadana tiende a mostrar que, lejos de representar un peligro para la democracia, la participacion insurgente representa su principio dinamico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.048
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de droit internationalSame topicCriminal Justice and PenologyFrench-language works237,207