MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Does Training in the Cold Enhance Body Weight and Fat Loss in Obese Adolescents?

2006· article· en· W2526220643 on OpenAlexaff
Boguslaw Wilk, Jae-Hyun Lee, Marta Kubacki, Raymond Trott, Oded Bar‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWeight lossTreadmillPhysical therapyBody weightAnalysis of varianceObesityAnimal sciencePhysiologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite published studies on the use of cold environment as a means for weight loss in adults, we are not aware of similar studies in obese adolescents. Training in the cold may be particularly effective for weight loss in children and adolescents, since cold-induced thermogenesis is more intense in children than in adults. PURPOSE: To determine whether training in a cold environment would enhance body weight and body fat loss in obese adolescents. METHODS: Twenty obese (>30% body fat), otherwise healthy, adolescent boys, ages 12 to 16 years participated in a 6-week (3 times per week) exercise training program. The boys were asked not to change their normal activity and eating patterns throughout the study. A nutritional assessment was done pre- and post-training to check compliance. Boys were randomly allocated to train in the cold C (5 °C, n=1 0) or a thermoneutral environment TN (24.5 °C, n=10). Each 70 min training unit (3 × 20 min exercise bouts with 5 min rests in between) was performed in a climatic chamber. The boys alternated between treadmill walking and cycling (both at 60 % predetermined VO2max) throughout the 6 weeks. Height (Ht), weight (Wt), body composition (by DEXA) and VO2max on a treadmill were measured before and after the 6-week training period. Two-way ANOVAs with between (C vs. TN environment) and within (pre- vs. post-training) factors were used (level of significance p < 0.05). RESULTS: Initial values (Mean±SE) for age 14.11 ± 0.36 yr vs. 14.08 ± 0.34 yr were similar but Ht 166.5 ± 2.6 cm vs. 168.2 ± 3.0 cm, Wt 89.27 ± 6.94 kg vs. 92.51 ± 7.51 kg and body fat (%Fat) 40.97±2.45 % vs. 43.03±1 .76 % were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in TN than in C, respectively. VO2max per kilogram was almost identical: 32.8±1.7 mL·kg−1min−1in C and 33.0±3.1 mL·kg−1. min−1 in TN. Over the 6-weeks training the boys gained weight (1.93 %BW, p=0.11 vs. 0.67 %BW, p=0.97), and reduced % body fat (−1.21 %, p=0.02 vs. −0.39 %, p=0.62) in C and in TN, respectively. However the differences between C and TN were insignificant (p > 0.05) for both weight gain and %fat loss. CONCLUSION: The 6-week exercise training in the cold induces significant %fat loss in obese boys, without losses in total body weight. Although the %fat loss was threefold greater in C (1.2%) than in TN (0.4%) this difference was statistically insignificant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→