Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente des résultats de recherche portant sur l’identification d’indicateurs de santé qui peuvent influencer l’intensité des réactions de deuil chez des parents qui vivent la mort de leur bébé en période périnatale. Ce type de perte provoque des remises en question qui semblent influencer la santé des parents endeuillés. Cette étude descriptive avait pour but de vérifier le rôle du sens donné à la vie sur la perception de la perte et les réactions de deuil des parents, deux mois et six mois après la perte de leur bébé. Les résultats mettent en évidence l’importance de soutenir les familles lorsque celles-ci présentent un sens donné à la vie moins positif, une perception de la perte plus négative et un faible soutien social. Il est recommandé d’explorer davantage l’expérience du père face au deuil d’un bébé et de lui accorder autant d’importance qu’à celle de la mère dans les suivis offerts. Pour le milieu clinique, on suggère d’explorer davantage les indicateurs de santé pour adapter les suivis selon les besoins des familles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".