MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526282643 · doi:10.21700/ijcis.2016.105

Integrated Broadband Powerline and Visible Light Communication (VLC) using OFDM and Turbo Coding

2016· article· en· W2526282643 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nader Nassar, Nidhal Abdulaziz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computing and Information Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisible light communicationBroadbandOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingCoding (social sciences)Turbo codeComputer scienceTurboElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsOptoelectronicsPhysicsMathematicsDecoding methodsEngineeringStatisticsLight-emitting diode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is focused on the communication scheme and its integration of Power Line Communication (PLC) and Visible Light Communication (VLC) systems. As the power line communication is becoming more popular in the last mile and home networking. In order to make the Power Line Communication (PLC) based networks more practical by having mobility at the last inch connectivity the VLC can be utilised. Some work has been done in the area of using power line for communications but these systems suffer from noise, inter symbol interference (ISI), and distortion. Most of the current proposed integrated systems are through Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) and OFDM techniques, where they are considered as candidates for future broadband PLC networks. Our work is different in a sense that it is incorporating turbo codes in the integrated system to increase the system robustness to noise, ISI and distortion. The signal data to be transmitted will be connected through the Power Line modulator which is connected to the wall socket. The PLC modulator is then connected to the VLC modulator for the transmission of the signal in the air. At the receiver side however, the transmitted signal is then received through the VLC demodulator followed by the PLC demodulator. By introducing the turbo coder and decoder we were able to achieve a better performance for the integrated system to noise, ISI, and distortion. The performance of the system was measured through comparing the BER rate for the system with and without the turbo codes. The BER rate was also measured with respect to the signal to noise ratio, and data rate. Simulation results using Matlab was conducted to show the systems performance towards noise and other factors. A practical implementation for the PLC was assembled to better support the simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computing and Information SciencesSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207