Foaming Cyclo-Olefin Copolymers with Carbon Dioxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclo-olefin copolymers (COC) based on ethylene-norbornene (E-NB) structures have been investigated with respect to their foamability. COC present interesting characteristics, such as extremely low water absorption, excellent water vapor barrier properties, high strength and very good electrical insulating properties. Varying the ratio of E versus NB monomers enables to tune the glass transition temperature (T g ) over a wide range. Due to the rigid ring structure of NB, the resin remains amorphous. This study presents basic information related to the foam processing of different grades of COC resins with T g varying between 80 and 130 °C, adding a special emphasis on process-relevant material characteristics: rheology, solubility and plasticization. CO 2 -laden COC sheets, where the gas sorption was obtained using high pressure autoclave, were foamed using a biaxial stretcher. The impact of selected processing parameters (temperature, time of pre-heating, speed of deformation, magnitude of stretching) on the microcellular foam morphology and density will be reported throughout this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".