MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrophysiological Characterization of Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies (HNPP) (P6.255)

2016· article· en· W2527001044 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shinichiro Takahashi, Marvin Chum, Kurt Kimpinski

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLiabilityPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To provide an electrophysiologic (nerve conduction studies, NCS) characterization of a large cohort of patients with genetically confirmed Hereditary Neuropathies with liability to Pressure Palsy (HNPP). Background: HNPP is an inherited neuromuscular disorder associated with mutations on chromosome 17p11.2 at the peripheral-myelin-protein-22 (PMP22) gene. A quintessential diagnostic tool is electrophysiological testing. Some characteristic NCS features have been reported, but a clear electrophysiological phenotype has yet to be determined. Methods: All patients from 1977-2015 with genetically-confirmed HNPP seen at the Neuromuscular clinic in London Health Sciences Centre (London, Ontario, Canada) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters obtained include: sex; age at NCS; age at symptom onset; family history, location of symptoms; areflexia; atrophy on examination; and Medical Research Council strength score. Standard nerve conduction studies were performed focusing on the presence of focal compressive neuropathies and length dependent polyneuropathy. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS version 23 software. Results: 55 patients in total had genetically-confirmed HNPP, of which 47 patients had a sufficient set of NCS for analysis. Female to male ratio was 1:1.2 with an average age of 42.6 (95[percnt] CI 38.0-47.1) years. Median disease duration was 5.5 years. Screen for generalized neuropathy, 34[percnt] had reduced and 19.5[percnt] absent sural sensory responses. Sural conduction velocity was normal in only 10[percnt]. With respect to compressive neuropathies, 13.2 [percnt] had focal compression of the peroneal nerve at the fibular head, 13.5[percnt] ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, and 88.1[percnt] distal median neuropathy at the wrist (carpal tunnel). 85.7[percnt] had abnormal terminal latency for median motor study to thenar eminence, with a mean latency of 5.95 ms (95[percnt] CI 3.9-13.35). Conclusions: A high proportion of our cohort had polyneuropathy. Median terminal motor latency prolongation comprised the vast majority of focal neuropathies with compression at other sites occurring in a minority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207