MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527050163

Canadian cities on the edge: Reassessing the Canadian suburb

2008· article· en· W2527050163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
RS Fiedler, JD Addie

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Half a century of explosive suburban expansion has fundamentally changed the
\nmetropolitan dynamic in North American city-regions. In many cities the imagined
\nsuburban “bourgeois utopias” that evolved during the 19th Century, in material and
\ndiscursive opposition to the maladies of the city, have given way to diverse forms of
\nsuburban and exurban development. New, complex and contradictory landscapes with
\ndiverse social, infrastructural and political-economic characteristics have appeared
\nwithin pre-existing urbanisms and urban forms. This maelstrom of growth, with its
\nassociated fluid geographical restructuring, is being reflected in qualitatively different
\nrhythms of everyday suburban life and has engendered stresses in the institutional and
\ninfrastructural cohesion of the metropolis – problematizing scalar governmental
\nrelations between city and suburbs, the theoretical and applied use of “urban” solutions
\nto address “suburban” problems, and what constitutes “urbanity” itself.
\nFocusing on the Canadian context from a broad (yet by no means exclusive range of
\nmethodological and theoretical perspectives, it can be argued that, despite their
\nubiquitous presence, suburban society, space and politics have been unduly sidelined in
\nvarious bodies of geographic literature. In response to this deficit, we think it is time to
\ndevelop a research agenda for critically unpacking the complex social, institutional and
\ninfrastructural realities of contemporary suburban landscapes. In particular, we suggest
\nfuture studies of “the suburbs” may benefit by engaging with the following: (1) the
\ncontinuing predominance of an uncritical city-suburb dichotomy; (2) the presence of “inbetween landscapes”, poorly acknowledged in both urban and suburban imaginaries; (3)
\nthe theoretical de-valorization of “forgotten” suburban spaces and lives within the
\ncontemporary metropolis; and (4) the dialectical interplay between (sub)urban society,
\nspace and politics. A re-conceptualisation of “the suburbs” requires a holistic
\nunderstanding of the city’s varied landscapes, everyday realities, and contemporary
\npolitical infrastructures, allowing us to grasp the fluidity and dynamism (and emerging
\ncontradictions) shaping present-day urban experiences in Canadian city-regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUCL Discovery (University College London)Same topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207