MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527224225

Mechanical properties, dimensional stability, and mold resistance of heat-treated jack pine and aspen.

2008· article· en· W2527224225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueForest Products Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite materialMoldRelative humiditySwellingFlexural strengthHumidityYoung's modulusMaterials sciencePinus <genus>Jack pineHorticultureAnimal scienceBotanyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quebec wood species, jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) and aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), were thermally treated in an industrial furnace using 'Bois Perdure' technology. The species were heated from room temperature up to their respective maximum heat-treatment temperatures. The mechanical properties, dimensional stability, and mold resistance of these species were determined and compared with those of untreated wood. This information is essential for the users of these new products. Results indicate that modulus of rupture (MOR) of heat-treated jack pine and aspen decreased, whereas modulus of elasticity (MOE) of the same heat-treated species increased, respectively. The increased MOE indicates that jack pine and aspen became stiffer after the heat treatment. Compared to the untreated species, hardness of treated jack pine in radial, tangential, and longitudinal directions increased whereas the hardness of heat-treated aspen decreased in radial and tangential directions, and increased in longitudinal direction. Screw withdrawal strength of heat-treated jack pine decreased, but this decrease was not significantly different from the untreated controls. Screw withdrawal strength of heat-treated aspen was found to be relatively higher than that of untreated aspen. Dimensional stability was evaluated using both the percentage thickness swelling (TS) tests and water soaking tests for both species before and after heat treatment. All the tests were carried out with a different set of specimens. First, all the specimens were conditioned at 65 percent relative humidity (RH) and 22 °C. Three different tests were carried out using these specimens. TS measurements were carried out for a group of specimens right after the conditioning. The second group of specimens were soaked in water for 24 hours, and their weight change and TS were measured. The third group of specimens were reconditioned at 95 percent RH and 22 °C. Afterwards, their TS was measured. Results show that the dimensional stability of heat-treated jack pine and aspen was improved considerably after heat treatment. Mold resistance of heat-treated jack pine was improved compared to the untreated sample; mold resistance was improved for heat-treated aspen; however, it was not significantly different from the untreated aspen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it