Crystallographic and computational study of <i>t</i>-butyl <i>N</i>-[3-hydroxy-1-phenyl-4-(pyridin- 2-ylsulfanyl)butan-2-yl]carbamate and its pyrimidin-2-yl analogue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The crystal structure analysis of the biologically-relevant title compound (1) shows the carbonyl-O2 and amide-H atoms to be anti, and perpendicular relationships between the carbamate residue and the pyridyl ring [dihedral angle=84.60(10)°] and between the carbamate and aryl ring [74.84(11)°]; the rings are approximately co-planar [12.07(17)°]. An intramolecular hydroxyl-O–H···N(pyridyl) hydrogen bond that closes a S(7) loop is noted. Of interest is the observation that this hydrogen bond is not found in the structure of the pyrimidinyl analogue (2) which was characterised as a monohydrate, i.e. 2·H2O, in an earlier study. Density-functional theory calculations show the observed conformation in 1 is 2.0 kcal/mol more stable than the conformation where the intramolecular hydrogen bond is absent. This energy difference reduces to ca 0.5 kcal/mol in the case of 2. The differences in molecular conformations found for 1 and 2 are therefore ascribed to the dictates of overall molecular packing, in particular due to the influence of lattice water in 2·H2O.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".