Gastropods living in a bird nest, and others pulmonate shells found in avian nests of Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gastropods living in a bird nest, and others pulmonate shells found in avian nests of Argentina Abstract: Bird’s nests are examples of specialized habitats that are inhabited by a diverse suite of invertebrates, such as insects, spiders, pseudoscorpions, and ticks. A list of gastropods found in birds’ nests from Argentina are presented for the first time. A total of 138 specimens of gastropods, belonging to 11 species, 10 genera and 8 families of snails were present in 44 birds’ nests from 6 families in 6 provinces from Argentina. Only one population of Pupisoma latens , integrated by 58 specimens of different sizes, was found alive in a bird nest, being a new habitat of this species, described from aerial parts of trees. The rest of the species were dead specimens (fragments or empty shells), that can be tentatively related to bird diets. The most abundant species were pre-adults of Bulimulus b. bonariensis , and Succinea meridionalis. The nests of Anumbius annumbi , and Furnarius rufus from Buenos Aires province have the highest number of specimens. Specimens of freshwater snails ( Heleobia parchappii , Biomphalaria sp. and Drepanotrema sp.) were 13% in the total. This kind of list was known in Canada, United States and France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".