AN INTENSIVE NATIVE LANGUAGE PROGRAM FOR ADULTS: THE INSTRUCTORS' PERSPECTIVE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. For Aboriginal people, the understanding and practice of traditions are closely connected with language leaming, as the ways of thinking and viewing the world are encoded in Native languages. However, because few fluent speakers remain as language teachers, new ways of learning are needed to restore the languages to use. The article describes the perceptions of the instructors about the structure of an adult language program and changes that have been made as a result of the findings from the first cohorts. Strategies for language development are discussed, along with recommendations and cautions for future adult language programs. UN PROGRAMME INTENSIF DE LANGUE AUTOCHTONE POUR LES ADULTES: LE POINT DE VUE DES ENSEIGNANTS RESUME. Pour les peuples autochtones, la comprehension et la pratique des traditions sont etroitement liees a l'apprentissage d'une langue, car les modes de reflexion et de perception du monde sont codes dans les langues autochtones. Toutefois, etant donne qu'il reste peut de locuteurs pour enseigner les langues, il faut trouver de nouveaux modes d'apprentissage pour retablir les langues a employer. Cet article decrit les perceptions des charges de cours sur la structure d'un programme de langue destine aux adultes et sur les changements operes a l'issue des resultats des premieres cohortes. Les auteurs analysent les strategies d'acquisition du langage, et formulent des recommandations et des mises en garde au sujet des futurs programmes d'apprentissage des langues pour les adultes. TSI NIKARIWAYEN. Tsi ase shononnihatye' tsi nihoti'nikonhrayenta's tsi nihotirihoten's, otya'ke ne Rotihrohkwayen ronnehre' ahonateryentarake' ne tsi nikarihoten' tsi niyoht tsi ikare ne Owenna'onwe. Akwah ronaterihwayenni tsi ken' nishati'ah Rontatis ne Onkwehonwehneha tsi shekon enhatikweni' ne ahshakorihonnyen', ne'e aorlwa tsi nikentyohkwa'ah, nene ratiweyentehta's ne Owenna, wahonnityohkonni' ne Kanyen'keha ahshakotirihonnyen' tho nayawen' ne aonsahatiwennaketsko' are ne tsi nihotiwennoten'. Ahsen niyohserake yotohetston tahnon tohkara niyoteratstonne' tsi wa'thatiteni' tsi niyoht tsi ratirihonnyennis. Ken'en kahyatonnyon ne'e enwathrori' tsi nahaten wahonttoke' nene shakotirihonnyennis tahnon tsi naho'tenhshon wa'thatitenyonko' tsi nahe nene thonatyerenhtanne' Ronterihwayenhstha, tahnon oni tsi nahaten enhshakoti'nikanron' nene ronnehre ahshakotirihonnyen' ne Owenna'onwe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".