MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528255633 · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2007.010

Assessing Fish Community Structure in Relation to Water Quality in a Small Estuarine Stream Receiving Oil Refinery Effluent

2007· article· en· W2528255633 on OpenAlexaffabout
Geneviève Vallières, Kelly R. Munkittrick, Deborah L. MacLatchy

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluentEnvironmental scienceWater qualityMinnowEstuaryRefineryOil refinerySpecies richnessAbundance (ecology)Water pollutionFisheryEnvironmental engineeringEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>Waste managementBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A large oil refinery discharges its effluent into Little River, a small estuarine stream entering Saint John Harbour, New Brunswick, Canada. An effects-based approach was used to assess the potential responses of fish and fish habitat to the effluent from the oil refinery. The study included a fish community survey and a water quality survey. Lower abundance, species richness, and biodiversity, as well as increased frequency of empty minnow traps, were found downstream of the effluent discharge. Water quality surveys demonstrated that the receiving environment is subjected to extended periods of low dissolved oxygen levels downstream of the effluent discharge. The anoxic periods correlated with the discharge of ballast water through the waste treatment system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207