MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epidemiology of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Manitoba, Canada: Does This Approximate Clinical Trial Data?.

2005· article· en· W2528429690 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vi Dao, Morel Rubinger, Eric J. Bow, Brent Schacter, Tsiporah B. Shore, Donna M M Woloschuk, Alain Demers, Xiaoyun Sun, Matthew D. Seftel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationEpidemiologyConfidence intervalInternal medicineTransplantationPediatricsClinical trialRegimenSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Outcomes of unselected adult ALL patients (pts) have not been well studied at a population level. Whether such pts behave differently to those in formal clinical trials is unclear. We developed a uniform therapeutic protocol as the provincial standard of care in Manitoba, a province with 1.2 million people, for adult pts since 1989 (“ALL89-1”). The aim of this retrospective study was: to ascertain the local epidemiology of adult ALL; to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of the ALL89-1 regimen and any other regimens given to pts in a population-based setting. Methods: All pts aged ≥18 years (yrs) diagnosed with ALL in Manitoba between 01/1989 and 11/2004 were identified via the provincial cancer registry. A review of computerized and paper charts was conducted. We focused on demographics, diagnostic clinical characteristics, therapy, treatment related toxicities, and whether stem cell transplantation (SCT) was performed. Results: There were 81 pts with a median age of 44yrs (range, 18–90). 53 (65%) pts were male. 58 pts received ALL89-1, 12 received other regimens and 11 patients received palliation only. Thirteen pts were Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+). Complete remission (CR) rate after one cycle of induction therapy was 74% for all pts, and 74% for ALL89-1 pts. At a median follow-up of 56 months (range 7–265), estimated overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) at 5 years was 26% (95% Confidence interval [C.I.], 15–36) and 24%( 95% C.I. 14–35). The 5 year OS and LFS for the ALL89–1 group was 23% (95% C.I. 11–35) and 20% (95% C.I. 8–32). There were 13 treatment related deaths in the 58 ALL 89-1 pts, 4 of whom died post SCT. In multivariate analysis for all 81 pts, attainment of CR post induction chemotherapy independently predicted improved survival (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% C.I. 0.11–0.5). In contrast, age > 55yrs, Ph+ status, and high WBC at diagnosis were not significant survival predictors. Palliative pts survived for a median of 10 days (range, 0–53) from diagnosis. Conclusions: This comprehensive province-wide study of adult ALL pts treated at a single cancer centre shows that durable leukemia free survival is possible, but for only a small subgroup. These results appear inferior to results of published clinical trials. The reasons for the relatively poor outcomes require further analysis in this and other jurisdictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207