MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of lipid nanoparticle siRNA delivery systems on silencing clusterin and progression in enzalutamide resistant prostate cancer in vivo.

2015· article· en· W2528523331 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshiaki Yamamoto, Paulo J.C. Lin, Fan Zhang, Yoshihisa Kawai, Eliana Beraldi, Jeffrey Leong, Hideyasu Matsuyama, Pieter R. Cullis, Martin Gleave

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClusterin in disease pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLNCaPGene silencingClusterinSmall interfering RNACancer researchIn vivoProstate cancerEnzalutamideMedicineGene knockdownAndrogen receptorApoptosisCancerCell cultureTransfectionChemistryBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

256 Background: Clusterin (CLU) is induced by androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibition and its overexpression confers treatment resistance. Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) facilitates tumor uptake and intracellular processing through an enhanced permeation and retention effect (EPR), currently with multiple products undergoing clinical evaluation. Gene silencing using small interfering RNA (siRNA) is a promising approach but in vivo delivery remains a major barrier. In our study, we investigated the efficacy siRNA tumor delivery using LNP systems in enzalutamide-resistant (ENZ-R) castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) model. Methods: To validate the effect of LNP siRNA tumor delivery in vivo, gene silencing of a reporter gene, luciferase (LUC), in PC3-M-luc stable cell line was treated with LNP LUC-siRNA and examined for Luc activity by the IVIS imaging system. Next, we investigated the efficacy of LNP CLU-siRNA tumor delivery and LNP CLU-siRNA sensitized AR knockdown activity in ENZ-R CRPC LNCaP in vitro and in vivo models. Results: LNP LUC-siRNA exhibited LUC silencing effects in PC-3M-luc xenograft and metastatic models. LNP CLU-siRNA suppressed PSA and decreased AKT and ERK phosphorylation in ENZ-R LNCaP cells in vitro. LNP CLU-siRNA sensitized AR antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) activity, more potently inhibiting ENZ-R cell growth rates and increased apoptosis when compared to AR-ASO monotherapy. In vivo,combinatory treatment of LNP CLU-siRNA and AR-ASO significantly suppressed tumor growth and serum PSA levels compared to LNP LUC -siRNA (control) and AR-ASO in ENZ-R LNCaP xenografts. Conclusions: The LNP CLU-siRNA systems sensitized AR knockdown resulting in inhibition of ENZ-R LNCaP cell growth, providing pre-clinical proof-of-principle as a promising AR co-targeting approach in ENZ-R CRPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicClusterin in disease pathologyFrench-language works237,207