Une communauté d’apprentissage professionnelle pour le changement des pratiques pédagogiques en enseignement des sciences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous avons mis en place une communaute d’apprentissage professionnelle (CAP) regroupant des enseignants du Nouveau-Brunswick, une agente pedagogique et des chercheurs. Des rencontres de la CAP ont eu lieu durant lesquelles des activites pedagogiques en sciences integrant le cycle d’apprentissage en 5E (modele d’enseignement en sciences) et des strategies langagieres ont ete coconstruites et implantees. Cette recherche collaborative veut documenter d’une part, le cheminement des enseignants dans un projet qui vise a ameliorer leurs pratiques d’enseignement en sciences et d’autre part, et leur appropriation du cycle d’apprentissage en 5E et des strategies langagieres. L’analyse des donnees a permis de constater que les changements de pratiques pedagogiques ne sont pas sans avoir leur part de defis. Du cote didactique, l’analyse des donnees nous informe egalement sur la comprehension qu’ont les enseignants du cycle d’apprentissage et ses 5E et des obstacles quant a son implantation en salle de classe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".