Addressing the Uncertainty Due to Random Measurement Errors in Quantitative Analysis of Microorganism and Discrete Particle Enumeration Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parameters associated with the detection and quantification of microorganisms (or discrete particles) in water such as the analytical recovery of an enumeration method, the concentration of the microorganisms or particles in the water, the log-reduction achieved using a treatment process, and the sensitivity of a detection method cannot be measured exactly. There are unavoidable random errors in the enumeration process that make estimates of these parameters imprecise and possibly also inaccurate. For example, the number of microorganisms observed divided by the volume of water analyzed is commonly used as an estimate of concentration, but there are random errors in sample collection and sample processing that make these estimates imprecise. Moreover, this estimate is inaccurate if poor analytical recovery results in observation of a different number of microorganisms than what was actually present in the sample. In this thesis, a statistical framework (using probabilistic modelling and Bayes’ theorem) is developed to enable appropriate analysis of microorganism concentration estimates given information about analytical recovery and knowledge of how various random errors in the enumeration process affect count data. Similar models are developed to enable analysis of recovery data given information about the seed dose. This statistical framework is used to address several problems: (1) estimation of parameters that describe random sample-to-sample variability in the analytical recovery of an enumeration method, (2) estimation of concentration, and quantification of the uncertainty therein, from single or replicate data (which may include non-detect samples), (3) estimation of the log-reduction of a treatment process (and the uncertainty therein) from pre- and post-treatment concentration estimates, (4) quantification of random concentration variability over time, and (5) estimation of the sensitivity of enumeration processes given knowledge about analytical recovery. The developed models are also used to investigate alternative strategies that may enable collection of more precise data. The concepts presented in this thesis are used to enhance analysis of pathogen concentration data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment so that computed risk estimates are more predictive. Drinking water research and prudent management of treatment systems depend upon collection of reliable data and appropriate interpretation of the data that are available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.047 | 0.139 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".